There are variations, of course-some people cheat on their partners and want to know if they have to say something, others regret a meeting with a sex worker-but the basic question remains the same:
If I've been a victim of an STD, how long do I have to wait before I know any infection, will be discovered by an STD test?
Answer:Unfortunately, the issue of getting an STD test is not easy to answer. Start with STD testing is not perfect-although you theoretically have waited long enough for a test to work, you could still end up with a false positive or false negative. Then you must take into account the fact that not all STD test functions in the same way. Some tests look directly for the presence of a pathogen, while others look after your body immune response to infection.
In theory, should try to look directly for the pathogen to be positive is faster because the pathogens are there from the beginning of the infection, but they often require samples taken from an infected place to work. New tools have allowed doctors to use urine test for Chlamydia and gonorrhea, but other infections, such as HPV can be more difficult to detect without the presence of an obvious wound or lesion.
On the other hand, blood tests to look for antibodies does not require a doctor to know where the test, but it takes time to turn positive. This is because your body immune system must first respond to infection, and then produce detectable quantities of antibodies. Different types of antibodies peak at different times after infection. This fact can be used to determine how long you have been infected with an STD in some cases, but the delayed reaction also affects how long it takes for a test will be reasonably predictive infection.
Who can answer, how long it would take no definitive test positive or negative on a STD test after a risky sexual encounter would require to know a number of things including: what Std person, who had been exposed. What tests were used to detect infection. There are also a number of other, more nebulous factors, which can play a role, make it impossible to give a definitive answer on how long they should wait to go get a test. It is a difficult issue from a research point of view-how to ethically and practically exposes a person to an STD and repeatedly then test them to determine how long it takes for them to test positive? Because of this, there is little no rigid data about how long after an exposure people should wait to get tested for many Std.
Common practice suggests that people could go to basic investigation for bacterial Std as soon as 2 to 3 weeks after exposure-previously if the symptoms-but that they would need to be retested again at least three to six months out to feel relatively certain of their results. Some tests for Chlamydia and gonorrhea would be reasonably accurate a month, but tests for other diseases such as herpes and HIV take longer to be crucial.
Other question people often ask-are explicitly or not-in these e-mails ", I have to tell current/future partners that I may have been exposed to an STD?" This question can be changed often of "what if we only had oral sex?" or "what if it is not long?", but my answer is usually the same.
These are discussions, all of which should have before they have sex. Most people come not to engage in sexual relationships completely inexperienced, and so talking about testing and safe sex not only appropriate but smart. If nothing else, if you can't bring you to the discussion, it is always a good idea to practice safe sex until you are reasonably certain of your test results. Condoms may not be perfect, but they are far better than doing nothing at all.
The issue of the publication is certainly more complicated for persons who have been unfaithful to current partner, but I believe that more people would be willing to forgive an adultery, not inadvertently expose them to Std than, as did. At least if someone betrays an adultery, they give your partner a chance to minimize their emotional and physical risks.
Although people have probably used it as a tool for manipulation, infect a person with an STD is not a healthy way to do partner bo with you or to persuade them to overlook an adultery. Fortunately, when most people get over the initial shock and the stigma of a STD diagnosis, they realise that the fear is not love. Dating with Std can not always easy--but it is better than staying with a partner that is emotional or physical abuse.
Sources:
Boiler (H), Cay S, Brown A, Glasier a. Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection is indicated for women under 30 are using emergency contraception. Contraception. 2002 OCT; 66 (4): 251-3.
0 comments:
Post a Comment